Close Menu
Truth Republican
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Guns & Gear
  • Healthy Tips
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Truth Republican
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Guns & Gear
  • Healthy Tips
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Newsletter
Truth Republican
You are at:Home»Guns & Gear»Is Defensive Firearms Training Defensible?
Guns & Gear

Is Defensive Firearms Training Defensible?

Buddy DoyleBy Buddy DoyleJuly 10, 2025No Comments8 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp
Is Defensive Firearms Training Defensible?
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


By Massad Ayoob

Posted in
#Skills

Editor’s Note: Massad Ayoob served 19 years as Chair of the Firearms/Deadly Force Training Committee for the American Society of Law Enforcement Trainers (ASLET), more than 20 years on the Advisory Board for the International Law Enforcement and Educators Training Association (ILEETA), and 17 years of the Advisory Board of the Armed Citizens Legal Defense Network. This article is presented for discussion purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Please familiarize yourself with the federal, state and local laws in your area, and seek high-quality training and legal advice.

We often hear on the gun-related Internet something like, “Don’t take defensive shooting training! It will make you look in court like a psycho obsessed with killing people!”

Preparing for a self-defense situation includes not just shooting skills, but understanding the legal side as well. Proper training provides documentation if decisions are ever questioned in a legal setting.

Might the other side try to make that argument? Sure. Guess what: the accusing side’s job is to make you look bad. But if you can show the triers of the facts, the jury and the judge, that such an argument is BS, you’ve shown the jury that you’re telling them the truth and the other side isn’t, and that puts your side on the path to being proven innocent in court.

Total disclosure: I’ve been an instructor in firearms and judicious use of lethal force since 1972 and an expert witness for the courts in related matters since 1979. I make my living primarily in teaching these things, secondarily in writing about them, and tertiarily in testifying on these matters in court. Of course, it is in my financial interest to promote quality training.

The photo shows a judge sitting at the bench in a courtroom, wearing judicial robes and looking over paperwork or evidence. The background includes traditional courtroom features like the American flag, wood paneling, and legal books or a gavel. The judge’s presence highlights the formal setting where self-defense cases are tried and where evidence — including firearms training records — can be closely examined. The image captures the seriousness of the legal process and the authority of the judge in guiding the trial and instructing the jury. This visual is relevant to discussions about courtroom procedures, self-defense trials, and the impact of documented firearms training in legal settings.
During a self-defense trial, the judge’s decisions on what evidence is allowed can make a significant impact. Training records and expert testimony often come under close review in these cases.

But I didn’t get into training because I could make money at it. I got into it because it can save lives, it can prevent mistaken shooting tragedies that cause terrible harm on both sides of the gun, and because solid, documentable training can exonerate those who are wrongfully accused of crimes for legitimately defending themselves.

Here’s how it works.

Don’t Take My Word For It

Founded in 1958, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers comprises some 9,000 practicing members and is a tremendous resource of knowledge on how criminal trial law is actually practiced in the United States. I served two years in the 1990s as Co-Vice Chair of their Forensic Evidence Committee. I have learned a great deal from many of their members. Their monthly professional journal, Champion, is a sound source of valuable trial strategy advice.

The photo shows firearms instructors from the Massad Ayoob Group standing alongside students on an outdoor shooting range. The trainers provide close guidance as students practice defensive shooting techniques, focusing on safe gun handling and correct form. Ear and eye protection are worn by all participants, highlighting the emphasis on safety during live-fire drills. The trainers appear attentive and engaged, giving direct feedback and instruction. This scene illustrates the value of professional firearms training, which can later serve as documented evidence in a self-defense trial to demonstrate responsible preparation.
Massad Ayoob Group instructors (in black shirts with red hats) show students proper trigger pull during a firearms training class. Image: Gail Pepin

In their March, 2007 issue, they published the classic article “Defending the Self-Defense Case” by Attorney Lisa Steele. Ms. Steele is widely recognized as the nation’s leading appellate lawyer who specializes in cases that went wrong at the trial level and resulted in unmeritorious — that is, unjust — convictions. In that article, she wrote that the trained defendant is the most defensible!

Why? Because the documentation of training will show that the defendant who acted correctly was in fact within the law. How will that be shown? I invoke another famous denizen of the courts, the late Irving Younger. Younger earned fame as a trial lawyer, as a judge, and particularly as a trainer of other trial attorneys.

Live The Armory Life. The latest content straight to your inbox plus an automatic entry to each of our monthly gun giveaways!

His most famous lecture was “The Ten Commandments of Cross Examination” in which he explained that all cross examination should be destructive, that is, should destroy the credibility of the witness whose testimony has been harmful to your case.

 “Younger’s Rule of Three”

In one of his other lectures, Judge Younger pointed out that jurors aren’t tape recorders and can’t remember everything. He said something I’ve found to be absolutely true, and I call it “Younger’s Rule of Three.” He reminded us that the jury is being flooded with testimony, some of it contradictory or difficult to understand, and if they hear something once from one witness they may not even pick up on it. But Younger said if the jury hears the same thing from a second credible source, it’s going to be on their radar screen, and by the time they’ve heard the same thing a third time from a third credible source, the judge said, “No power on earth will convince them that it is not true.”

The photo shows Massad Ayoob standing at a podium in a conference room, speaking to a group of attorneys during a Continuing Legal Education seminar sponsored by the State Bar of Texas. He gestures while addressing the audience, who are seated and taking notes or listening attentively. The setting is professional, with presentation materials and legal documents visible on tables or screens. This scene highlights the importance of education for lawyers on self-defense trial strategy and how firearms training factors into legal defense. The image is relevant to topics about legal education, self-defense law, and the ways attorneys prepare for defending self-defense shootings in court.
The author teaches at a Continuing Legal Education seminar sponsored by the State Bar of Texas.

How does that apply in court? Let’s look at a police shooting case, where training is almost always documentable and easy to introduce in court. The agency’s lead use of force instructor testifies, “We taught this officer to handle it the way he did, and here is why.” That’s one. We bring in someone from that state’s POST (Police Officer Standards and Training) entity to show that the training the officer received from his or her agency comports with state-approved standards. That’s two. Then the defense lawyer calls in someone who teaches the same thing at the national level to testify that, yes, this training is in keeping with national standards for best practices. That’s three.

The winning strategy is this: to show the judge or jury that the defendant did what he or she was trained to do in such a life-threatening emergency, and what he or she was trained to do was in fact the right thing to do — that is, within the standard of common custom and practice for dealing with such emergencies. “Best practices.”

The photo shows an empty jury box in a traditional courtroom, with several wooden chairs lined up and ready for jurors to arrive. The view includes details like polished woodwork, a judge’s bench in the background, and subdued lighting, creating a serious and formal atmosphere. This image was taken ahead of a self-defense shooting trial, where the jury will be responsible for deciding if the defendant’s actions were justified under the law. The absence of jurors highlights the anticipation before a case begins and the importance of their role in evaluating evidence, including any firearms training records. The scene relates to courtroom proceedings, self-defense trials, and the critical job of the jury.
An empty jury box awaits the start of a self-defense shooting trial, where jurors will weigh evidence and testimony about the defendant’s actions and training. The jury’s understanding of firearms instruction can impact how they view claims of justified self-defense.

What about a private citizen who has never been to a police academy, and doesn’t have that sort of training? If they have taken training at a private school or state-mandated training for a carry permit, their instructor should be brought in to testify as to the training. That can be followed by a competent expert witness to testify to the same thing at a national standard level. Finally, the defendant himself testifies as to what he understood the training to be, and explains how he correlated that training with the situation he faced in the incident and the action he took. That’s three credible testimonies.

Defeating the “Trained to Kill” Argument

If you have been to a “Self-Defense Shooting School” and the other side tries to paint you as a “trained killer,” do not despair. That training could be some of your strongest defense.

The photo shows Massad Ayoob standing next to a large paper shooting target, pointing out specific areas that were hit during a firearms training class. He is in an outdoor or indoor range setting, surrounded by training materials and wearing typical range gear such as ear and eye protection. Ayoob’s posture suggests he is explaining shot placement, accuracy, and the importance of controlled fire to a group of students. The target displays various bullet holes, illustrating outcomes of live-fire drills often used to teach self-defense marksmanship. This image connects to topics about firearms training, defensive shooting skills, and the documentation of ability for legal defense in self-defense cases.
Visual feedback from targets is part of documenting skills for potential legal scrutiny. Image: Gail Pepin

Your side can bring in someone like court-proven expert witness Karl Rehn, who did the study with the Texas Department of Public Safety, the issuing authority for carry permits in that state, which showed that only one out of a hundred permit-holders ever went beyond the minimum-mandatory training.

Now, when the other side tries to show that you were incompetent or acted wrongly, your side can show that you were the 1% who took your responsibility so seriously that you went above and beyond the requirements to make sure you never made a mistake with the power with which you had been entrusted!

Let me again invoke NACDL and their journal, Champion. In their June 2025 issue, their cover story was an article titled “Advanced Cross-Examination: Impeachment by Violation of Training” by Larry Pozner, the attorney who has taken over the mantle of the late Judge Younger as the most famous lawyer-trainer in the area of cross-examination.

The long, detailed article shows how to destroy the credibility of an arresting or investigating officer by showing they did not follow their training. Now, what is the corollary lesson? It is that if testimony shows that the person in question did follow their training, they are virtually unimpeachable — that is, the opposing side probably can’t convince the judge or jury that they did the wrong thing!

Obviously, you want your training to be solid and unimpeachable. Not “kill ’em all and let God sort ’em out” ridiculousness, but the kind of training cops and lawyers who carry guns themselves, seek out. In the time of the internet, there are many AARs (After Action Reports) by students on the many self-defense classes now available. Do your research before you pay for training.

Good training can save your life on the street, and good training can help prove your innocence in the courtroom.

Editor’s Note: Please be sure to check out The Armory Life Forum, where you can comment about our daily articles, as well as just talk guns and gear. Click the “Go To Forum Thread” link below to jump in!

Join the Discussion

Go to forum thread

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleBud Light, Netflix join forces to make ‘Quarterback’ documentary series parody for fans with Peyton Manning
Next Article Hamas Said It Will Release Ten Israeli Hostages

Related Articles

Ammo Prices Just Crashed, But Nobody’s Buying. Here’s Why.

Ammo Prices Just Crashed, But Nobody’s Buying. Here’s Why.

July 11, 2025
Top 7 Henry Lever Guns That Are Worth Every Penny!

Top 7 Henry Lever Guns That Are Worth Every Penny!

July 11, 2025
Five-Strong Fleet of RoseCraft Folders Inbound

Five-Strong Fleet of RoseCraft Folders Inbound

July 10, 2025
Gun Groups Warn: Trump’s Carry Bill Could Be A Legal Disaster

Gun Groups Warn: Trump’s Carry Bill Could Be A Legal Disaster

July 10, 2025
Leatherman Leaps into Deep End of the Knife Pool with Five New Models

Leatherman Leaps into Deep End of the Knife Pool with Five New Models

July 9, 2025
Do You Need a “Deep Carry” Clip?

Do You Need a “Deep Carry” Clip?

July 9, 2025
American Gun Stores Can’t Keep These 9 Pistols In Stock Right Now!

American Gun Stores Can’t Keep These 9 Pistols In Stock Right Now!

July 9, 2025
First Look: SAINT Victor 8.5″ 9mm Pistol

First Look: SAINT Victor 8.5″ 9mm Pistol

July 8, 2025
Boker Atlas Mini Carries a Smaller World on Its Shoulders

Boker Atlas Mini Carries a Smaller World on Its Shoulders

July 8, 2025
Don't Miss
The ‘big, beautiful, bill’ includes a car loan interest tax deduction. Do you qualify?

The ‘big, beautiful, bill’ includes a car loan interest tax deduction. Do you qualify?

State Department to axe 1,800 employees

State Department to axe 1,800 employees

Veteran political reporter reveals what the media missed about Trump’s appeal to Americans in 2024

Veteran political reporter reveals what the media missed about Trump’s appeal to Americans in 2024

TOP 10 BEST TACTICAL GLOVES ON AMZON 2020

TOP 10 BEST TACTICAL GLOVES ON AMZON 2020

Latest News
DHS fires back after Mahmoud Khalil targets Trump admin for M over detention

DHS fires back after Mahmoud Khalil targets Trump admin for $20M over detention

July 11, 2025
‘Nothing to stand on’: Ex-White House physician slams Biden doctor for silence during House GOP grilling

‘Nothing to stand on’: Ex-White House physician slams Biden doctor for silence during House GOP grilling

July 11, 2025
TOP 5 BEST HUNTING BOW 2020

TOP 5 BEST HUNTING BOW 2020

July 11, 2025
Americans now view this figure as the benchmark for being wealthy

Americans now view this figure as the benchmark for being wealthy

July 11, 2025
Republicans relentlessly use Mamdani as socialist cudgel to bash vulnerable Democrats

Republicans relentlessly use Mamdani as socialist cudgel to bash vulnerable Democrats

July 11, 2025
Copyright © 2025. Truth Republican. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.