Close Menu
Truth Republican
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Guns & Gear
  • Healthy Tips
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Truth Republican
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Guns & Gear
  • Healthy Tips
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Newsletter
Truth Republican
You are at:Home»Politics»Only one House Dem voted in favor of voter ID, proof of citizenship in US elections
Politics

Only one House Dem voted in favor of voter ID, proof of citizenship in US elections

Buddy DoyleBy Buddy DoyleFebruary 12, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp
Only one House Dem voted in favor of voter ID, proof of citizenship in US elections
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The House of Representatives passed a massive election integrity overhaul bill on Wednesday despite opposition from the vast majority of Democrats.

The House passed Rep. Chip Roy’s SAVE America Act, legislation that’s aimed at keeping non-citizens from voting in U.S. federal elections. All but one House Democrat — Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas — voted against the bill. It passed 218 to 213.

It is an updated version of the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, also led by Roy, R-Texas, which passed the House in April 2025 but was never taken up in the Senate.

Whereas the SAVE Act would create a new federal proof of citizenship mandate in the voter registration process and impose requirements for states to keep their rolls clear of ineligible voters, the updated bill would also require photo ID to vote in any federal elections.

MURKOWSKI BREAKS WITH GOP ON VOTER ID, SAYS PUSH ‘IS NOT HOW WE BUILD TRUST’

It would also require information-sharing between state election officials and federal authorities in verifying citizenship on current voter rolls and enable the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to pursue immigration cases if non-citizens were found to be listed as eligible to vote.

Democrats have attacked the bill as tantamount to voter suppression, while Republicans argue that it’s necessary after the influx of millions of illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. during the four years of the Biden administration.

“If we want to rebuild confidence again in American elections, we need to pass the SAVE Act,” Rep. Mike Haridopolos, R-Fla., told Fox News Digital. “What better way to eliminate that distrust than to make sure that whoever votes in an American citizen who is truly eligible to vote?”

Chip Roy

House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., accused Republicans of trying to make it harder for women to vote. She argued that the legislation would make it more difficult for married women to cast ballots if their surname is different from their maiden name on their birth certificate.

“Republicans aren’t worried about non-citizens voting. They’re afraid of actual American citizens voting. Why? Because they’re losing among women,” Clark said during debate on the House floor. “This is a minefield of red tape that you have put in front of women and American citizens and their right to vote.”

REPUBLICANS, TRUMP RUN INTO SENATE ROADBLOCK ON VOTER ID BILL

But House GOP Policy Committee Chairman Kevin Hern, R-Okla., emphasized that it was about keeping illegal immigrants from voting in U.S. elections.

Sign warning against voter fraud

“This really is about feeding the narrative that Democrats want illegally from all over the world to come here to support them,” Hern said of Democrats’ opposition.

Republican Study Committee Chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital, “The American people did not give Republicans a mandate to make excuses. They gave us one to deliver wins, and the SAVE America Act is exactly that. Every single Democrat who voted no today proved they would rather let illegal aliens tip the scales in our national elections than protect your vote.”

If implemented, the bill could see new requirements imposed on voters in this year’s November midterm elections.

But it would have to pass the Senate, where current rules dictate that at least several Democrats are needed to meet the 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster.

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleAffluent Upper East Side explodes in outrage over controversial homeless shelter: ‘Unacceptable!’
Next Article Instagram chief compares ‘addictive’ platform to Netflix binge-watching during trial testimony: report

Related Articles

Trump calls for 2nd ‘big, beautiful bill’ to fund ICE on his desk by June 1

Trump calls for 2nd ‘big, beautiful bill’ to fund ICE on his desk by June 1

April 1, 2026
UK scraps police probes of legal social media posts after review says response went too far

UK scraps police probes of legal social media posts after review says response went too far

April 1, 2026
Former Virginia governor challenges Spanberger to debate her redistricting flip-flop

Former Virginia governor challenges Spanberger to debate her redistricting flip-flop

April 1, 2026
Swing-district Democrat faces backlash after vulgar late-night post targeting Trump, doubles down

Swing-district Democrat faces backlash after vulgar late-night post targeting Trump, doubles down

April 1, 2026
EXCLUSIVE: Unearthed videos expose how Trump-endorsed candidate championed DEI in university hiring process

EXCLUSIVE: Unearthed videos expose how Trump-endorsed candidate championed DEI in university hiring process

April 1, 2026
Sanders-backed NJ Dem accused of hiding from voters as skipped forums pile up

Sanders-backed NJ Dem accused of hiding from voters as skipped forums pile up

April 1, 2026
White House marks Holy Week, Easter with days of prayer centered on religious liberty

White House marks Holy Week, Easter with days of prayer centered on religious liberty

April 1, 2026
Trump says he’s considering pulling US out of NATO over Iran war stance

Trump says he’s considering pulling US out of NATO over Iran war stance

April 1, 2026
SCOTUS slated to weigh future birthright citizenship protections for millions — here’s what at stake

SCOTUS slated to weigh future birthright citizenship protections for millions — here’s what at stake

April 1, 2026
Don't Miss
TOP 5 AMAZING 5.11 TACTICAL GEAR & GADGETS 2022

TOP 5 AMAZING 5.11 TACTICAL GEAR & GADGETS 2022

Apple retires well-known product after 20 years as it shifts strategy

Apple retires well-known product after 20 years as it shifts strategy

Trump calls for 2nd ‘big, beautiful bill’ to fund ICE on his desk by June 1

Trump calls for 2nd ‘big, beautiful bill’ to fund ICE on his desk by June 1

Gavin Rossdale credits son’s school ride playlist for his country music kick ahead of Stagecoach

Gavin Rossdale credits son’s school ride playlist for his country music kick ahead of Stagecoach

Latest News
Trump’s ‘Peace’ Talk is Pure Deception – And Iran Just Won the War

Trump’s ‘Peace’ Talk is Pure Deception – And Iran Just Won the War

April 1, 2026
Americans ditch EVs for bigger vehicles as auto trends reverse

Americans ditch EVs for bigger vehicles as auto trends reverse

April 1, 2026
Should you microdose Ozempic? Experts are split on risks vs benefits

Should you microdose Ozempic? Experts are split on risks vs benefits

April 1, 2026
UK scraps police probes of legal social media posts after review says response went too far

UK scraps police probes of legal social media posts after review says response went too far

April 1, 2026
Inside Supreme Court: How Trump heard birthright citizenship arguments

Inside Supreme Court: How Trump heard birthright citizenship arguments

April 1, 2026
Copyright © 2026. Truth Republican. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.