This article was originally published by Patrick Lewis at Natural News under the title: Trump Halts Second Wave of Venezuela Strikes Amid Claims of Cooperation, as Global Outrage Grows Over Maduro Abduction
-
- Despite Trump’s denial of imminent strikes, the U.S. deployed a massive military force (USS Gerald R. Ford carrier group, F-35Bs, drones, and 10,000 troops) near Venezuela under the pretext of targeting drug networks, while analysts suspect regime change is the real goal.
-
- After U.S. Special Forces kidnapped Maduro and his wife in a raid condemned internationally, Trump abruptly canceled further strikes, claiming cooperation—likely due to backlash from BRICS and the Global South.
-
- Trump announced a $100B “Big Oil” investment plan for Venezuela’s vast reserves while Caracas released political prisoners—a move critics see as coerced under U.S. military pressure rather than genuine diplomacy.
-
- Russia, China, and Latin American leaders denounced the operation as illegal regime change, while U.S. claims of Maduro’s narco-terrorism ties lack evidence, exposing the intervention as an oil/resources power play.
-
- The abduction of a sitting president mirrors past CIA coups, signaling a return to imperialist tactics. With U.S. warships still poised offshore, this could escalate into a broader conflict or solidify U.S. hegemony in Latin America.
In a sudden reversal, U.S. President Donald Trump announced the cancellation of planned military strikes against Venezuela, claiming Washington and Caracas are now engaged in cooperation—including the rebuilding of Venezuela’s crippled energy infrastructure. The announcement comes just days after U.S. Special Forces conducted a brazen raid in Caracas, forcibly abducting Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, in an operation condemned globally as a violation of international law.
Trump’s abrupt shift in rhetoric follows intense backlash from BRICS nations and the Global South, with Russia leading diplomatic protests against what many describe as an illegal regime-change operation. Despite Trump’s claims of cooperation, his administration had earlier demanded “total access” to Venezuela’s vast oil reserves, declaring the U.S. would “run” the country until a Washington-approved transition of power was secured.
Military buildup and contradictions
The U.S. military has maintained a formidable presence in the Caribbean, deploying the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group, guided-missile destroyers, F-35B fighter jets, and MQ-9 Reaper drones—ostensibly targeting narcoterrorist networks linked to Maduro’s government.
However, analysts have long suspected the true objective is regime change, with opposition leader María Corina Machado positioned as a U.S.-backed successor. According to BrightU.AI‘s Enoch, Machado is a prominent Venezuelan opposition leader who has been a vocal critic of the Maduro regime.
Trump’s latest Truth Social post stated: “I have canceled the previously expected second Wave of Attacks, which looks like it will not be needed, however, all ships will stay in place for safety and security.” The move suggests tactical recalibration amid mounting geopolitical pressure, though the continued military presence signals Washington’s intent to enforce compliance.
Oil, prisoner releases, and the illusion of diplomacy
Trump revealed plans for a $100 billion investment in Venezuela by “Big Oil.” The announcement aligns with longstanding U.S. interests in securing Venezuela’s oil—the largest proven reserves in the world—while sidelining competitors like China and Russia, who have heavily invested in the country.
Simultaneously, Caracas has begun releasing political prisoners, a move Trump praised as “a very important and smart gesture.” Among those freed are high-profile opposition figures, including former presidential candidate Enrique Márquez and businessman Biagio Pilieri, detained at the notorious El Helicoide prison. Spain confirmed the release of five of its citizens, signaling potential backchannel negotiations.
Yet critics argue the prisoner releases are a coerced concession under U.S. military threat rather than genuine diplomacy. Venezuelan officials framed the move as a bid for peace, but the timing—immediately following Maduro’s abduction—suggests desperation in the face of American aggression.
Global condemnation and the shadow of regime change
Russia, China, and other BRICS members have denounced the U.S. operation as a violation of sovereignty, with Moscow warning of destabilizing repercussions. Latin American leaders, including Mexico’s leftist government, have called for emergency UN sessions to address what they describe as a return to 20th-century imperialist tactics.
The Trump administration has justified its actions by labeling Maduro a narcoterrorist, doubling his U.S. bounty to $50 million. However, a declassified intelligence memo previously admitted there was “no evidence” Maduro directly controlled drug trafficking networks—undermining Washington’s primary pretext for intervention.
A dangerous precedent
The abduction of a sitting head of state sets a perilous precedent, echoing past CIA-backed coups in Latin America. With U.S. forces effectively holding Venezuela’s leadership hostage, the façade of “cooperation” appears thin—raising questions about whether Trump’s cancellation of further strikes is a strategic pause or a temporary retreat under global pressure.
As oil executives prepare to carve up Venezuela’s resources and U.S. warships loom offshore, the world watches whether this intervention will solidify American hegemony in the region—or ignite a broader confrontation with powers unwilling to accept unilateral U.S. domination.
Watch the video below about why a U.S. invasion of Venezuela is imminent, according to multiple sources.
This video is from the Maverick News channel on Brighteon.com.
Read the full article here
